Analysis of Quality and Cognitive Levels of Physics Final Assessment Questions of Class X

Main Article Content

  Agustina Trianti Br Sinaga
  Rosane Medriati
  Eko Risdianto

Abstract

This study aims to describe the quality and distribution of cognitive levels of physics final assessment questions for class X. This research is a quantitative descriptive study. The research subjects were in the form of student questions and answer sheets at Senior High Schools 4, 8, and 9 Bengkulu City. The results showed that Senior High School 4 had 64% good questions, 12% good enough, 24% bad, and cognitive levels C1 (4%), C2 (20%), C3 (68%), C4 (8%), there is neither C5 nor C6. Senior High School 8 has 21% good questions, 11% good enough, and 68% bad questions, as well as cognitive levels C1 (3%), C2 (13%), C3 (55%), C4 (29%), and not there are C5 and C6. Senior High School 9 has 7% good questions, 29% good enough, 64% bad questions, and cognitive levels C1 (11%), C2 (21%), C3 (68%), and no C4, C5 or C6.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sinaga, A. T. B., Medriati, R., & Risdianto, E. (2023). Analysis of Quality and Cognitive Levels of Physics Final Assessment Questions of Class X. IJOEM Indonesian Journal of E-Learning and Multimedia, 2(3), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.58723/ijoem.v2i3.135
Section
Articles

References

Anita, A., Tyowati, S., & Zuldafrial, Z. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Fisika Kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v16i1.780

Effendi, R. (2015). Konsep Revisi Taksonomi Bloom Dan Implementasinya Pada Pelajaran Matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v2i1.1483

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Ermiana, I., Hidayati, V. R., & Widodo, A. (2020). Validity and reliability of cognitive tests study and development of elementary curriculum using Rasch model. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 3(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v3i1.51

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Soal Kemampuan Membedakan Rangkaian Seri Dan Paralel Melalui Teori Tes Klasik Dan Model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i1.24080

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005

Novia, T., Wardani, A., Canda, C., Nurdi, N., & Nurmasyitah, N. (2020). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal UTS Fisika Kelas X SMA Swasta Muhammadiyah 4 Langsa. GRAVITASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Sains, 3(01), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.33059/gravitasi.jpfs.v3i01.2256

Oktanin, W. S., & Sukirno, S. (2015). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 13(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v13i1.5183

Purwanti, M. (2014). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Mata Pelajaran Akuntansi Keuangan Menggunakan Microsoft Office Excel 2010. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 12(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v12i2.2710

Sari, R. A., Susanta, A., & Hanifah, H. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal Buku Matematika Kelas VII Materi Garis dan Sudut Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. FARABI: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.47662/farabi.v4i2.157

Suardipa, I. P., & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Peran Desain Evaluasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Widyacarya, 4(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.55115/widyacarya.v4i2.796

Susanto, H., Rinaldi, A., & Novalia. (2015). Analisis Validitas Reabilitas Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Beda pada Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 203–217. 10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.50

Syahida, A., & Irwandi, D. (2015). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Soal Ujian Nasional Kimia. Edusains, 7(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i1.1404

Umacina, N. E. P., Mondolang, A. H., & Rondonuwu, I. T. (2020). Analisis Butir Soal Sumatif Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unima, 1(2), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.53682/charmsains.v1i2.14

Usman, M. (2021). Kualitas Soal Ujian Akhir Sekolah Mata Fisika SMA Negeri Se- Kota Baubau. Syntax Idea, 3(10), 2171–2185. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v3i10.1527

Wahyuni, T., Yensy, N. A., & Irsal, N. aliyyah. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal Uji Kompetensi Pada Buku Teks Matematika Kelas VII Terbitan Kemendikbud Revisi 2017 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. FARABI: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.47662/farabi.v4i2.195

Most read articles by the same author(s)